0 votes
asked by (120 points)
Like lots of folks in the United States, I've a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and while they see fit the government distributes my taxes. To be able to get that salary, I'm necessary to go a urine test, which I've no problem with. I have nothing to hide and the primary reason I've no problem with a drug test is. What I do have a problem with could be the distribution of my fees to folks who are doing drugs and never have to move a urine test.

Because I've to pass one to earn it for them, should not one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check?

Please comprehend, I have no issue with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with supporting somebody sit writing on the wall lyrics their bottom. Could you imagine if people had to pass a urine test to obtain a public assistance check how much money the state would save yourself?

A 1999 Michigan law required a pilot program of random drug abuse screening in at least three areas. Drug assessment started in the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a selected part of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

Most of the new applicants for that region had to provide a urine test to officers or quit their right to any government support. Additionally, any people already within the system needed to submit to random screening.

A class action suit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days ahead of schedule testing. The suit charges the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Clicking ways to detox before a drug test possibly provides suggestions you could give to your pastor. Two Michigan parents and a Detroit business (The Westside Mothers) were called in the suit. The business centers around addressing numerous welfare recipients and their loved ones. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan claims, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no person in this country could be put through a search by the government until there's reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients could be poor, but that is not a not yet, anyway."

I've spoken to several people in person and on forums about their feelings and those that oppose this have exactly the same position, that it's unconstitutional. This grand niacin drug detox wiki has many unique warnings for the reason for this belief. For me, it seems that I'm maybe not driving random drug examination onto any random resident. The welfare recipient chooses to get support from the government. Therefore much like submitting paperwork, you should send a urine sample. Another position people talk about is false positives. Then do a hair follicle test, well when they claim false positive. Clicking gnc drug detox drink possibly provides aids you should tell your uncle.

If urine test are unconstitutional, then scrap the whole welfare program. Let your voice be heard on Political Majority.com..

You do not have permission to perform this operation

Welcome to Ladonize Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.